• Subscribe
  • Magazines
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Sunday 29 May 2022
  • 中文中文
  • 日本語日本語
IAG
Advertisement
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Consulting
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
No Result
View All Result
IAG
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Consulting
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
No Result
View All Result
IAG
No Result
View All Result

Macau Gaming Law Report Part 2: Government Authorization of Dividends

Andrew W Scott by Andrew W Scott
Sun 26 Dec 2021 at 08:23
Macau GGR up 55% in November to MOP$6.75 billion
93
SHARES
2.3k
VIEWS
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

This article is part 2 in a series of articles on the Macau Gaming Law Public Consultation Final Report. For links to all articles in the series, see the index at the end of this article.

As discussed in the introduction to this series, the unexpected early release of the Gaming Law Public Consultation Final Report late on 23 December 2021, well before the deadline of March 2022, makes it abundantly clear the Macau government is intent on completing the gaming concession relicensing process before the current concessions expire on 26 June 2022, thus obviating any need for a short or medium-term extension to the concessions.

The initial panic

The release of the Macau government’s consultation document late in the afternoon of 14 September – a document downloaded 9,648 times and distributed by hard copy 1,404 times during the 45 day consultation period – caused quite the stir in the global investment community, leading to an irrational panic selloff of Macau gaming stocks on 15 September and a resultant annihilation of 26% or US$18.4 billion in market capitalization of the Hong Kong listed entities of Macau’s six gaming concessionaires.

Most of this panic was caused by six key issues, each of which will be the subject of separate articles in this series. However, since the release of the consultation document, most of these six issues have been referenced by the Macau Gaming Inspection and Coordination Bureau (DICJ) or the Secretary for Economy and Finance, either tangentially or more substantively, with at least hints dropped that the final outcomes might not be as calamitous as the market initially feared.

There is, however, one glaring exception – the issue raised at item 3.3 of the consultation document, the proposal that concessionaires require government authorization before declaring dividends. An English translation of the proposal is as follows:

“To enable concessionaires to make better use of the benefits obtained from the gaming business in promoting the continuous and diversified development of Macau, it is recommended that when distributing profits, regardless of whether it is paid in the form of cash or equity, concessionaires must meet specific requirements in advance and obtain the prior authorization of the SAR government.”

Of all the consultation document proposals, this “dividend authorization” measure created the most concern, and for very good reason.

Public opinion on the proposal

Public opinion during the consultation period to a greater or lesser extent agreed more than it disagreed with the various consultation document proposals – with one glaring exception: the dividend authorization proposal. The final report states that of 46 opinions expressed on this proposal, only 18 (39%) agreed while 28 (61%) disagreed.

Views in agreement were summarized in the report as follows:

  • It ensures some concessionaire profits are used for social needs or for the expansion of activities in Macau
  • It prevents concessionaires making payments which weaken their solvency

Views in disagreement were summarized in the report as follows:

  • It violates principles of the free market
  • Profit distribution is purely a normal business decision and concessionaires should be given relative autonomy in determining dividends
  • The SAR government should do a good job of supervision rather than directly intervening in concessionaires’ commercial decisions
  • Under the capitalist system, the proposal is contrary to the protection of private property
  • It runs counter to the legal system of the Macau SAR
  • It increases uncertainty in concessionaire operations
  • It will seriously affect investor confidence
  • It interferes with the industry business cycle
  • It may affect concessionaire investment and ability to reinvest
  • In the face of Macau’s already high gaming tax system, it may affect concessionaire enthusiasm in participating in social affairs
  • It will weaken the financial resources of concessionaires
  • Dividends should not be restricted if concessionaires maintain financial stability

The Macau government should be commended for its transparency in disclosing opinions which disagreed with the proposal.

Other ideas expressed in the report were:

  • The government should establish flexible treatment for dividends, given that dividends will influence concessionaire investment in non-gaming and social responsibility projects
  • Dividends should only be restricted if concessionaires fail to meet certain requirements
  • The government could be responsible for distributing a proportion of profits, with the remainder distributed by concessionaires or retained as a reserve
  • Concessionaires should comply with certain financial ratios before declaring dividends
  • A proportion of profits can be applied to social needs based on future economic development or non-gaming expansion
  • It is necessary to clarify the definition of profit sharing and the way it is calculated

Government response

The government provided an analysis of and response to the public’s views on the dividend authorization proposal, some of which was merely in line with the initial consultation document.

However, some new information was forthcoming. The government response noted, “The opinions collected during the consultation period do not agree with the proposed restriction, and the main reasons for disagreement are that it will interfere in free market operations and may affect the investment intentions of concessionaires.

“The SAR government will consider the concerns and suggestions put forward by various stakeholders, and comprehensively analyze the overall content of the amendment, and evaluate positive and negative impacts … in order to amend the law to protect the relevant interests.”

Did you notice it? The amendment was presented as a fait accompli. The government is saying, “Yes, we hear your objections, but guess what, there’s going to be an amendment to the gaming law on this anyway.”

⬇️ This article continues below the Related Posts  ⬇️

RelatedPosts

Another amendment to the Macau gaming law: concessionaire cross-shareholders now allowed, but only up to 5%

Another amendment to the Macau gaming law: concessionaire cross-shareholders now allowed, but only up to 5%

Mon 16 May 2022 at 14:37
Macau government considering tax break for concessionaires who recruit “foreign” customers

Macau government considering tax break for concessionaires who recruit “foreign” customers

Fri 13 May 2022 at 20:07
Reprieve for existing Macau satellite casinos, allowed to continue beyond three-year grace period but without rev share

Reprieve for existing Macau satellite casinos, allowed to continue beyond three-year grace period but without rev share

Fri 13 May 2022 at 17:51
Slots 2.0

Slots 2.0

Wed 30 Mar 2022 at 18:07
Load More

The response also stated, “The gambling industry is a special industry.” This might be code for, “Yes, we understand our proposal is against normal free market principles and even contrary to general Macau commercial law, but you have to understand that gaming is ‘special,’ and that’s our justification for doing this.”

The take-away message

But here’s the good news. The key take-away sentence in the government response is this, “Measures to restrict dividends are not designed to prevent reasonable profit distributions from normal business practices, but to ensure that the concessionaires have sufficient financial resources to fulfill their obligations stipulated in the law and under the concession contract.”

This is the answer everybody has been waiting on – if it is to be believed. It clarifies that the policy intention is “not designed to prevent reasonable profit distributions from normal business practices.” They just want the concessionaires to be solvent, to have the cash on hand to do what the government wants them to do. So, if you believe this, and you believe that Macau gaming concessionaires have historically had “sufficient financial resources to fulfill their obligations stipulated in the law and under the concession contract,” then you must believe that the proposal to require government authorization for dividends will not amount to any practical change for the Macau operators.

This is the first time the government has expressed this clarification and should go a long way to calming the market – if the market is astute enough to read between the lines and receive the message.

Our next step on the road to clarity is to wait until the draft amendment is made public, so that we can see the precise language drafted to give effect to the policy intention. And if my suspicion is correct, we might be seeing that as early as next month.

Part 3 of this series will be published on Wednesday 29 December.


MACAU GAMING LAW PUBLIC CONSULTATION FINAL REPORT SERIES
Article Index

Part 1: Introduction
Part 2: Government Authorization of Dividends
Part 3: How many concessionaires?
Part 4: Concession length?


 

Tags: DICJMacau gaming lawre-licensing
Share37Share7
Andrew W Scott

Andrew W Scott

Born in Australia, Andrew is a gaming industry expert and media publisher, commentator and journalist who moved to Hong Kong in 2005 and then Macau in 2009, when he founded O MEDIA, one of Macau’s largest media companies and parent company of Inside Asian Gaming.

Current Issue

Oz Casinos: What now?

Editorial: Does the foreigner-only casino model work?

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 28 Apr 2022 at 15:28

The COVID-19 pandemic, along with the international border closures it forced, is one of a number of recent headwinds to...

Oz Casinos: What now?

Oz Casinos: What now?

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 28 Apr 2022 at 15:14

With three inquiries into Crown Resorts completed, a review into Star Entertainment Group underway and a litany of damning findings...

Off Track: AUSTRAC’s AML Failures

Off Track: AUSTRAC’s AML Failures

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 28 Apr 2022 at 13:16

Australia’s anti-money laundering watchdog has launched civil proceedings against Crown Resorts in what appears to be a reaction to its...

Locals Game

Locals Game

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 28 Apr 2022 at 13:05

IAG recently spoke with Shaun McCamley, former President at integrated resort The Grand Ho Tram Strip on Vietnam’s south-east coast,...

Related Posts

Macau shop owners describe best business in months as Golden Week visitor numbers surge

Macau GDP down 8.9% in the first quarter of this year, gaming down 25.1%

by Pierce Chan
Fri 27 May 2022 at 20:02

According to the Macau Statistics and Census Service (DSEC), Macau’s gross domestic product (GDP) fell by 8.9 percent in real terms in the first quarter of 2022, with “exports of gaming services” falling by 25.1 percent. This is the second...

Satellite casinos can rent out properties, rents not regulated by Gaming Law

Satellite casinos can rent out properties, rents not regulated by Gaming Law

by Andrew W Scott and Pierce Chan
Fri 27 May 2022 at 19:51

Today (Friday 27 May) the Second Standing Committee of the Legislative Assembly of Macau continued its discussions on the new Macau Gaming Law. On the issue of satellite casinos, Committee Chairman Andrew Chan Chak Mo revealed that landlord owners of...

SJM buys Oceanus from parent STDM, plans to return gaming area to Macau government after December 31

SJM buys Oceanus from parent STDM, plans to return gaming area to Macau government after December 31

by Andrew W Scott and Pierce Chan
Fri 27 May 2022 at 14:59

SJM Holdings has announced that it will acquire Oceanus from its parent company STDM and promised to return the Oceanus gaming area to the Macau government after the existing Macau casino gaming concessions expire on 31 December 2022. However, this...

Field of Dreams

Citizen’s group collects required signatures to call referendum on Osaka IR

by Shintaro Kamimura
Fri 27 May 2022 at 06:41

A private citizens group announced on Thursday 26 May that it had collected more than the number of signatures required to call for a referendum challenging Osaka’s IR bid.  Citizens groups opposing casinos spent two months from 25 March to...


HKUST

Simple Play

IAG

© 2005-2022
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • NEWSFEED
  • MAG ARTICLES
  • VIDEO
  • OPINION
  • TAGS
  • REGIONAL
  • EVENTS
  • CONSULTING
  • Contributors
  • MAGAZINES
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE

No Result
View All Result
  • Subscribe
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Consulting
  • Magazines
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • About

© 2005-2022
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.