• Subscribe
  • Magazines
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
Saturday 9 August 2025
  • zh-hant 中文
  • ja 日本語
  • en English
IAG
Advertisement
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
  • 日本語
No Result
View All Result
IAG
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
    • Africa
    • Australia
    • Cambodia
    • China
    • CNMI
    • Europe
    • Hong Kong
    • India
    • Japan
    • Laos
    • Latin America
    • Malaysia
    • Macau
    • Nepal
    • New Zealand
    • North America
    • North Korea
    • Philippines
    • Russia
    • Singapore
    • South Korea
    • Sri Lanka
    • Thailand
    • UAE
    • Vietnam
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • 中文
  • 日本語
No Result
View All Result
IAG
No Result
View All Result

Power Play: Crown governance in the era of a special manager

David Green by David Green
Tue 7 Dec 2021 at 20:58
Power Play: Crown governance in the  era of a special manager
49
SHARES
1.2k
VIEWS
Print Friendly, PDF & Email

The appointment of a special manager with powers to oversee governance of Australia’s Crown Resorts for the next two years presents some unique challenges, writes former regulator David Green.

While the Finkelstein Royal Commission recommended Crown Melbourne be allowed two years in which to re-establish its suitability to hold a casino license, it clearly feared recidivism. To mitigate that concern it opted for the appointment of a “special manager” to serve as the company’s ultimate decision maker. The Victorian government has announced the appointment to that role of Stephen O’Bryan QC, a former Commissioner of the State’s Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC).

His instrument of appointment has not been made public, but the broad scope of the special manager’s powers and responsibilities is detailed in a Bill currently before Parliament which will substantially amend Victoria’s casino and gambling legislation when it is enacted. It is that Bill which indicates some of the challenges which the Board of Crown Melbourne is likely to face in exercising its functions while subject to the effective control of Mr O’Bryan.

Notably, his powers will include:

There is no requirement contained within the Bill that the appointee to the role of special manager must be “suitable” to occupy the position. The Bill provides that the special manager is not an associate of the casino operator; if he were an associate, he would be required to undergo a suitability assessment, including evaluation of suitability to occupy that role. While a former IBAC Commissioner is undoubtedly “fit and proper”, a test of suitability to occupy such an oversight role arguably would require more, such as relevant industry or regulatory, rather than investigative experience. Similarly, there is no threshold suitability requirement for contractors the special manager may engage to assist him. Presumably their terms of engagement would preclude conflicts of interest, and require confidentiality undertakings, but without a probity evaluation it is impossible to dimension the risk that a contractor with access to confidential or commercially sensitive company records might pose, irrespective of their ostensible affiliation or reputation.

It is not clear what “powers and privileges” the special manager will enjoy as a director of Crown Melbourne. He will have the right to attend Board and Committee meetings and examine records anyway. He will also be able to participate in a deliberative capacity in those meetings. What is potentially troubling, though, is the fact that he will not have any of the obligations, duties or liabilities of a director of Crown Melbourne. In particular, he will owe no fiduciary duty to the company, to Crown Resorts, as its group holding company, or to the listed company’s shareholders. This asymmetry is possibly unique in a solvent Australian company.

Aside from fiduciary duty, it appears that the special manager will not be at risk of incurring any vicarious liability either. Directors of Australian companies can be held personally liable for breaches of the law by the companies they govern, particularly in areas such as consumer protection, occupational health and safety, taxation, superannuation and environmental protection. The scheme of the Bill is to either absolve the manager of liability for anything done under the statute or attach that liability to the State if it arises under other legislation.

The power of the special manager to give a binding direction to Crown Melbourne is limited to certain defined circumstances, though he has a general power to give a direction substituting his judgement for that of the Board if he believes that the direction is in the “best interests” of the company or its casino operations. This has the potential to bring into sharper focus the asymmetry previously alluded to.

The special manager’s attention will be on the discharge of his functions, as detailed in both legislation and his instrument of appointment. His interest in commercial aspects of the business will likely be limited to matters which might threaten non-compliance with the law, or regulatory requirements. He will certainly not be driven by any imperative to maximize earnings, compete more aggressively for business or build shareholder value, other than by removing the stain of Finkelstein’s finding of unsuitability within his two-year term. It might be expected that if he is to err in judging what is in the best interests of the company, it will be on the conservative or lower-risk side.

Royal Commissioner Ray Finkelstein recommended the appointment of a special manager to oversee Crown Melbourne’s efforts to return to suitability.

How might this affect Crown Melbourne’s business? For example, and without being too fanciful, it may require a complete reset of the company’s approach to the issue of gambling harm minimization. Its self-proclaimed “world’s best approach” to problem gambling was found by Finkelstein to be at odds with reality. A reset could conceivably impact the company’s advertising and promotional activities, see a wind-back of high limit slots and necessitate a fundamental rethink of its customer loyalty program. If the Board can’t be persuaded of the need for such changes, it would arguably be competent for the manager to simply direct the Board to implement suitably revised policies on the ground that the best interests of the company would be served by so doing.

The substitution of the special manager’s judgement for that of the Board has another dimension, which the Bill does not appear to address. While the company’s directors will be bound to comply with any direction they receive from the manager, they are not shielded or indemnified by law in the event that they are sued by any third party adversely impacted by implementation of the direction. The only workarounds are either the company’s own Directors and Officers Insurance Policy or joining the State as a co-defendant in any court proceedings. A more satisfactory approach would simply be to provide a statutory protection against third party action for the Board when implementing any directions it may receive.

RelatedPosts

Editorial – Better late than never

Editorial – Better late than never

Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:13
Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:08
The Magic Number

The Magic Number

Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 06:41
Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 02:45
Load More
Tags: Current Issue
Share20Share3
David Green

David Green

The founder of Newpage Consulting, David Green has advised on casino regulation in a number of geographies including New Zealand, Singapore, Macau, Cambodia and Japan. He served as Presiding Member of the Independent Gambling Authority in South Australia prior to relocating to Macau in 2001.

Current Issue

Editorial – Better late than never

Editorial – Better late than never

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:13

Inside Asian Gaming has in recent weeks been hearing increasing chatter around a possible move by Vietnamese authorities to introduce...

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

Angel’s Yasushi Shigeta

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:08

Yasushi Shigeta, Chairman and owner of one of the world’s largest gaming industry suppliers, Angel Group, sits down with Inside...

The Magic Number

The Magic Number

by David Bonnet
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 06:41

In this in-depth deep dive into the evolution of the Asian gaming landscape, David Bonnet argues that many regional jurisdictions...

Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

Rashid Suliman – A road well traveled

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 02:45

Rashid Suliman, Vice President of Global Gaming Asia-Pacific for casino solutions provider TransAct Technologies, provides some insight into his unique...

Evolution Asia
Your browser does not support HTML5 video.
Aristocrat
GLI
Nustar
SABA
Mindslot
Solaire
Hann
Tecnet
HKUST
NWR

Related Posts

Editorial – Better late than never

Editorial – Better late than never

by Ben Blaschke
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 07:13

Inside Asian Gaming has in recent weeks been hearing increasing chatter around a possible move by Vietnamese authorities to introduce enhanced locals gaming to the market. Although such rumors have made the rounds before, inquires have confirmed that the chatter...

The Magic Number

The Magic Number

by David Bonnet
Thu 31 Jul 2025 at 06:41

In this in-depth deep dive into the evolution of the Asian gaming landscape, David Bonnet argues that many regional jurisdictions have been sucked into believing they can replicate the Macau or Singapore IR model – without access to those cities'...

Singapore’s Casino Legalization Experience: Setting the Standards for Minimizing and Managing Social Costs

ประสบการณ์การทำให้คาสิโนถูกกฎหมายของประเทศสิงคโปร์: การกำหนดมาตรฐานเพื่อลดผลกระทบทางสังคมให้น้อยที่สุด ขณะเพิ่มประโยชน์ทางเศรษฐกิจให้มากที่สุด

by Lau Kok Keng
Thu 10 Jul 2025 at 18:19

บทความนี้จะพิจารณากระบวนการที่ประเทศสิงคโปร์ดำเนินการเมื่อรัฐบาลประกาศในปี พ.ศ. 2547 พิจารณาให้การเปิดคาสิโนเป็นเรื่องถูกกฎหมาย รวมถึงทัศนคติของสาธารณชนต่อประเด็นดังกล่าว และวิธีที่รัฐบาลใช้ในการอธิบายแนวทางการจัดการความเสี่ยงจากปัญหาการพนัน บทความยังกล่าวถึงมาตรการป้องกันที่รัฐบาลได้นำมาใช้เพื่อลดผลกระทบทางสังคมและแก้ไขปัญหาการพนันตลอดจนกา

Singapore’s Casino Legalization Experience: Setting the Standards for Minimizing and Managing Social Costs

Singapore’s Casino Legalization Experience: Setting the Standards for Minimizing and Managing Social Costs

by Lau Kok Keng
Thu 10 Jul 2025 at 18:03

This article will examine the process Singapore went through when the government announced in 2004 that it was contemplating legalizing casinos, and the public sentiment to this and how the government sought to explain its intended management of the dangers...

Your browser does not support the video tag.


IAG

© 2005-2025
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • SUBSCRIBE FREE
  • NEWSFEED
  • MAG ARTICLES
  • VIDEO
  • OPINION
  • TAGS
  • REGIONAL
  • EVENTS
  • CONSULTING
  • CONTRIBUTORS
  • MAGAZINES
  • ABOUT
  • CONTACT
  • ADVERTISE
  • 中文
  • 日本語

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In

Add New Playlist

No Result
View All Result
  • 中文
  • 日本語
  • Subscribe
  • Newsfeed
  • Mag Articles
  • Video
  • Opinion
  • Tags
  • Regional
  • Events
  • Contributors
  • Magazines
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • About
  • Home for G2E Asia

© 2005-2025
Inside Asian Gaming.
All rights reserved.

  • 中文
  • English
  • 日本語