Inside Asian Gaming

IAG MAY 2021年5月 亞博匯 50 COLUMNISTS Public interest tests have been in use in areas such as privacy and national security legislation and in liquor licensing for many years in Australia. Yet there remains remarkably little guidance, either legislative or judicial, regarding the content of such tests. Either by design or default they have become rather subjective, and no real effort has been made to define the term, or a methodological approach to determining it. If Finkelstein contributes nothing further to what has already been established by Bergin, it should add to the analytic jurisprudence which supports our understanding of what a public interest test requires where a casino license is involved. 的娛樂場營運商在墨爾本（快將是澳洲最大的城市）壟斷該州博 彩業務超過25年後都能產生的結果？就皇冠涉嫌不遵守反洗黑錢 法律以及與有組織犯罪集團保持生意往來，這方面為該州帶來了 多少財務回報？如何對其進行評估量化？ 澳洲已將公共利益標準在隱私、國家安全法規、酒類許可等 領域中應用多年。 然而，就相關標準內容，無論是立法方面還是 司法方面，都幾乎沒有任何指引。從標準設計及預設層面，這都變 得相當主觀，並且看不到當局嘗試花心機以任何方法釐定公共利 益。 若Finkelstein對Bergin已經確定的內容不作任何添加，其應 以分析法理學方法剖釋我們對涉及賭牌之公共利益的見解 。